MULTILINGUAL AUDIO TRANSCRIPTION / VERIFIED 2026-10-12

Deepgram Nova-3
vs ElevenLabs Scribe v2

Compare Deepgram Nova-3 vs ElevenLabs Scribe v2 using official sources, cost units, supported workflows and provider access, with no fabricated benchmark winner.

PROVIDERSDeepgram · ElevenLabs
CONTEXTNot published · Not published
PRICINGmedia-specific pricing · media-specific pricing

LIVE VERIFIED FACTS

Current facts from the SXF model database.

Catalog 2026-10-12 · History 2026-10-12
DeepgramVerified 2026-10-12

Deepgram Nova-3

Context
Not published
Max output
Not published
Input / MTok
See native rates
Cached / MTok
—
Output / MTok
See native rates
Input types
audio
ElevenLabsVerified 2026-10-12

ElevenLabs Scribe v2

Context
Not published
Max output
Not published
Input / MTok
See native rates
Cached / MTok
—
Output / MTok
See native rates
Input types
audio
Facts are generated from the canonical model catalog, not copied into this comparison.Current data ↗Change ledger ↗

SPECIALIST BUYER GUIDE

What matters for visual creation.

Published facts · no synthetic ranking
01

Audio-time pricing

Deepgram Nova-3 lists pre-recorded MONOLINGUAL $0.0043/min ($0.258/hour). ElevenLabs Scribe v2 lists $0.22/hour. Different add-on policies and multilingual modes affect effective cost.

02

Language and diarization

Compare language support, accuracy on calls and accents, word-level timing, speaker diarization and keyterm prompting for each workflow.

03

Different modes

Nova-3 supports prerecorded and streaming with separate rate cards; Scribe v2 is focused on file/batch STT, and ElevenLabs has Scribe Realtime for streaming.

DECISION FACTORS

What materially changes the choice.

No synthetic winner score
01

Context capacity

Neither provider publishes a comparable token-based context limit for this video-generation service.

02

Input modalities

Both list audio as input types.

03

Direct token cost

Direct Standard token-cost comparison is unavailable because Deepgram Nova-3, ElevenLabs Scribe v2 does not have a calculator-eligible provider-published paid rate in the SXF catalog.

HOW TO DECIDE

Specifications narrow the field. Your workload decides.

Context, modalities and direct token economics are comparable from official sources. Coding quality, latency, reliability and agent success should be measured on your own acceptance tests before production routing.

01

Replay real tasks

Use representative prompts, files, tools and expected outputs from the workload you plan to ship.

02

Measure task cost

Include retries, cached tokens, long-context rules and tool charges—not only headline input price.

03

Track failures

Record hallucinations, tool errors, timeout behavior and human corrections alongside pass rate.

04

Route by task

A portfolio can outperform a one-model policy when different task classes have different cost and capability needs.

INDEPENDENT EVALUATIONS

No directly comparable independent result yet.

Evaluation registry ↗

SXF does not infer quality from specifications or compare benchmark scores across different evaluator versions/configurations.

WHAT CHANGED

Changes affecting this comparison.

No post-baseline factual changes recorded for Deepgram Nova-3, ElevenLabs Scribe v2 since 2026-10-12.

VERIFIED BASELINE2026-10-12Current facts remain aligned with the SXF ledger.

QUICK ANSWERS

Which has the larger context window: Deepgram Nova-3 or ElevenLabs Scribe v2?

Neither provider publishes a comparable token-based context limit for this video-generation service.

Which is cheaper: Deepgram Nova-3 or ElevenLabs Scribe v2?

Direct Standard token-cost comparison is unavailable because Deepgram Nova-3, ElevenLabs Scribe v2 does not have a calculator-eligible provider-published paid rate in the SXF catalog.

Does SXF declare an overall winner?

No. This page compares source-backed specifications and economics. Quality, latency and task success require workload-specific evaluation evidence.