VOICE-AGENT STREAMING TRANSCRIPTION / VERIFIED 2026-10-12

Deepgram Flux
vs ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime

Compare Deepgram Flux vs Scribe v2 Realtime using official sources, cost units, supported workflows and provider access, with no fabricated benchmark winner.

PROVIDERSDeepgram · ElevenLabs
CONTEXTNot published · Not published
PRICINGmedia-specific pricing · media-specific pricing

LIVE VERIFIED FACTS

Current facts from the SXF model database.

Catalog 2026-10-12 · History 2026-10-12
DeepgramVerified 2026-10-12

Deepgram Flux

Context
Not published
Max output
Not published
Input / MTok
See native rates
Cached / MTok
—
Output / MTok
See native rates
Input types
audio
ElevenLabsVerified 2026-10-12

ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime

Context
Not published
Max output
Not published
Input / MTok
See native rates
Cached / MTok
—
Output / MTok
See native rates
Input types
audio
Facts are generated from the canonical model catalog, not copied into this comparison.Current data ↗Change ledger ↗

SPECIALIST BUYER GUIDE

What matters for visual creation.

Published facts · no synthetic ranking
01

Published native prices

Deepgram Flux English uses a time-limited $0.0065/min streaming rate; Scribe v2 Realtime lists $0.39/hour (also $0.0065/min). Provider promotions and voice-activity policies may change real costs.

02

Turn detection

Flux offers speech recognition plus integrated end-of-turn detection. Scribe Realtime offers partial/final transcripts and VAD-assisted commits via WebSocket.

03

Latency decisions

Compare end-of-turn latency, interruption accuracy, reliability and accented/multilingual speech using your own agent sessions.

DECISION FACTORS

What materially changes the choice.

No synthetic winner score
01

Context capacity

Neither provider publishes a comparable token-based context limit for this video-generation service.

02

Input modalities

Both list audio as input types.

03

Direct token cost

Direct Standard token-cost comparison is unavailable because Deepgram Flux, ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime does not have a calculator-eligible provider-published paid rate in the SXF catalog.

HOW TO DECIDE

Specifications narrow the field. Your workload decides.

Context, modalities and direct token economics are comparable from official sources. Coding quality, latency, reliability and agent success should be measured on your own acceptance tests before production routing.

01

Replay real tasks

Use representative prompts, files, tools and expected outputs from the workload you plan to ship.

02

Measure task cost

Include retries, cached tokens, long-context rules and tool charges—not only headline input price.

03

Track failures

Record hallucinations, tool errors, timeout behavior and human corrections alongside pass rate.

04

Route by task

A portfolio can outperform a one-model policy when different task classes have different cost and capability needs.

INDEPENDENT EVALUATIONS

No directly comparable independent result yet.

Evaluation registry ↗

SXF does not infer quality from specifications or compare benchmark scores across different evaluator versions/configurations.

WHAT CHANGED

Changes affecting this comparison.

No post-baseline factual changes recorded for Deepgram Flux, ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime since 2026-10-12.

VERIFIED BASELINE2026-10-12Current facts remain aligned with the SXF ledger.

QUICK ANSWERS

Which has the larger context window: Deepgram Flux or ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime?

Neither provider publishes a comparable token-based context limit for this video-generation service.

Which is cheaper: Deepgram Flux or ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime?

Direct Standard token-cost comparison is unavailable because Deepgram Flux, ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime does not have a calculator-eligible provider-published paid rate in the SXF catalog.

Does SXF declare an overall winner?

No. This page compares source-backed specifications and economics. Quality, latency and task success require workload-specific evaluation evidence.